At this moment I'm having an interesting -- quite revealing, actually -- conversation on Facebook. I updated my status with what I thought was an unabashedly romantic statement the librettist and theatrical producer Oscar Hammerstein II made to then-Dorothy Blanchard Jacobson shortly after he'd met her:
"If I were a little boy in school and you were a little girl in school I'd carry your books home for you."
When they met in the 1920s they were both already in their 30s -- and married to other people, with children. Not the best of circumstances certainly, and even today there would be a lot of tsk-tsk'ing about the way they got together. But even Dorothy's daughter acknowledges that they probably fell for each other instantaneously, and by several accounts they remained in love to the very end.
My niece C -- an intelligent, thoughtful, highly independent young woman I'm quite proud of -- however, disagrees with my romantic take on this story. She thinks that if a boy had offered to carry her books home it would be a reflection on his belief that she's not strong or capable enough to do it herself. Plus, she says, the idea of a grown man thinking of her as a little girl is pretty creepy.
I know where she's coming from; at her age I wrestled with my views on old-fashioned chivalry versus my burgeoning feminist ideals. At her age I was living on my own, supporting myself, figuring how to do things that I'd never learned how to do. I was coming to terms with falling in love, getting into relationships, and trying not to lose my identity in the process. Surely a man didn't have to open the door for me or pull out my chair during a dinner date at a restaurant; I could easily do them for myself, thank you very much.
But as I've gotten older I've learned to live with the blurry lines and interpret male-female dynamics in terms other than power and control. But of course I know when I'm being demeaned or underestimated because of my sex -- that's something I can spot instinctively and react accordingly. For instance, if a guy sees me holding a power drill and jokes about what damage I might do with it, I may just show him how I could if I wanted to (like right then and there). Or if it's suggested that I can't replace my car's automatic transmission simply because I'm a girl I might reply that I know quite a few men, including my own father, who can't do so either. Besides, I'm not too thrilled with the idea of the monstrous thing crashing down onto my chest and pinning me under the car, where no one might find me for weeks.
So I do appreciate it when a man offers to carry something heavy for me, the same way I would offer to help anyone else I were with. The way I see it these days, it's about kindness and empathy, regardless of the sex of the person who was trying to help me. Some days I might accept the assistance, other days I may not because I'm good, really -- but I'd never take it against the guy who offered to ease my load.
I've been in relationships with men who were raised to show modern acts of chivalry with the women they're with, and I've been with those who had never met a door they liked. The truth is that I know which breed I prefer -- as long as they didn't make such a huge show of doing something nice for me and expecting something in return. When a man offers to hold my heavy bag of groceries I'd like to think it means he's thinking of me kindly, period. And it's always nice to know you're being thought of in that way.
But going back to Hammerstein's quote, I suppose it knocked me off my feet in the first place because it made me reflect on meeting the right one at the right time, before life got so darn complicated. When you fall in love when you shouldn't, with someone you shouldn't fall for, then the thing you hope for the most is that you can go back in time when everything was as easy as carrying a girl's books home from school.
MEN AND WOMEN: FRIENDS ONLY?
I have a girlfriend who can't name all the men she's slept with. She can remember vividly, however, a handful from early on as well as the few who came along the last couple of years (she's slowed down her pace considerably). But all the others in the middle -- more than 50 men, she reckons, although she's not quite sure of the exact number -- are nameless; some are even faceless to her now.
"How can you forget their names?" I demanded. "Not even a first name?" She shook her head.
"Haven't you ever slept with anyone you didn't know?" It was her turn to ask me a question. I shook my head this time.
"Oh yeah," she muttered. "You only hook up with friends."
I leaned back, eyes widened...and then my shoulders dropped. I had nothing to say. Except.
"I'm afraid of cooties," I said cooly. "And with guys you don't know, well, you just don't know."
After When Harry Met Sally hit the theaters in 1989, it seemed like everyone was asking the same question: can men and women just be friends? Harry didn't think so; he said the sex always got in the way. Sally disagreed -- and then fell in the sack with him during a terribly vulnerable moment. And just when it seemed that the friendship was ruined for good, they got back together when they realized they loved each other, and we all knew that Harry was right after all. At least in the movie.
What screenwriter Nora Ephron didn't get to say is that sometimes, sex doesn't so much get in the way but is along the way between two friends. It doesn't have to be a zero-sum game, where you can be only friends or lovers, and it doesn't always mean that just because a line has been crossed that you can't shuffle your feet backward across the line again. Of course, nothing's ever quite the same as it once was but I say that if the friendship was strong enough in the first place then it will survive the forward-and-back crossing eventually, if both wish it so.
That being said, I still believe that men and women can enjoy close friendships without ever crossing the line. Sure, in my life there were times I've had to hold up a bright red stop sign when a randy friend had tried to send a few signals of his own, but more often than not many of my guyfriends considered me just one of the guys (albeit nicer smelling and with soft towels and better furniture).
The other day I conducted my own (most-unscientific) survey on Facebook: I asked my friends who were online whether or not they thought men and women can remain just friends. All of them said yes; many with the caveat, though, "it depends."
My friend J, who is both a guy's guy and a girl's guy, said succinctly, "Of course men and women can be friends." He added that throughout his life many of his close friends were female and there wasn't any sex involved, only "the pleasure of hanging out together." My girlfriend M concurred, explaining that one of her best friends is a guy she's known since 8th grade: "We tell each other our secrets and troubles and get the opposite sex's point of view. We also have the same humor and tons of inside jokes... tons of history there!"
My sister J, who will never call a spade anything but, said it's possible -- but only if there's no sexual attraction between the two. Which was echoed by my friend A, who explained that once she gets closer to a guyfriend it's difficult not to become attracted to him. Thus, she maintains close friendships with men who are not her type physically or who aren't her ideal in any other way.
I also asked the same question to a couple of guys who had crossed the line from friend to lover in my life at some point. G, who has always had several female friends, had an interesting point of view: he said that once someone gets married, the extent of how close a friendship one can maintain with someone of the opposite sex depends on one's spouse, even when the marital bond is strong. And when you factor in demands of work and home, he added, the friendship invariably grows distant.
Which echoes what one of my best college guyfriends S explained to me more than a decade ago when I asked him why he didn't call me like he used to: "I don't think your husband would like it if I did." And after he himself had gotten married and had children, we never talked on the phone again.
I'm not sure what to make of R's response to my question: "I think so, we were friends first, right? Friendship only makes the love affair sweeter later on." Which is lovely to think about, but doesn't quite address whether men and women can be friends only.
And yet, his reply touches on why I've often chosen to get involved with men I was already friends with -- and sometimes, really good friends -- to begin with. You cut down the time it gets to know each other, there are usually no unpleasant surprises to deal with, and there's a high level of trust established. And what if it doesn't work out?
In my experience, at least, I become the one they talk to when they enter into their next relationship. After all, I can call them out on their shit before their new girlfriend does. Which makes perfect sense if you think of it -- because no one else knows what the women in their lives have to put up with quite like I do. And why waste a perfectly good friendship?